5.0
(72)
powered by Google Show Reviews

27.01.2026

No place of business without substance: business centers are not enough

Back to Home

Tax allocation outside the canton requires genuine operational presence

In decision 9C_349/2025, the Federal Supreme Court rejected the separation of self-employed income into another canton. The business office center used did not constitute a permanent business facility.

The decisive factor was that preparation, administration, and organization were predominantly carried out at the place of residence, where there was also a recognized study. Digital mail forwarding and occasional use do not replace operational substance.

The practice is clear: anyone who wants to pay tax on income outside their canton must actually work there – not just be present.

#Tax domicile #Sole proprietorship #Federal Supreme Court #Intercantonal #Business center #Tax allocation

https://x.com/zugtrust/status/2018714842148794710

(c) Ludwig Limbeck AG, 2026, Autor: Rolf Limbeck

Aktuelle Meldungen

10.02.2026
Strategic game changer: Federal Supreme Court revises practice regarding tax sovereignty
Mehr lesen
04.02.2026
Substantive domiciles: More than just an address
Mehr lesen
03.02.2026
UAE 2026: Attractive, but only with substance
Mehr lesen
02.02.2026
Organ function and social security: Titles are irrelevant
Mehr lesen
01.02.2026
Holding structures in 2026: Why Switzerland remains central
Mehr lesen
Back to Home